GLICKO - BOOST Deloitte / FIDE Chess Rating Challenge

نویسنده

  • Mark E. Glickman
چکیده

The rating system I entered into the Deloitte/FIDE Chess Rating Challenge, the “Glicko-boost” system, is a substantial extension of the Glicko system. The Glicko system (Glickman, 1999) is a rating system I invented in the mid-1990s in which each player is characterized at any time by two parameters: a rating, and a “ratings deviation” (RD). The RD, the main innovation of the Glicko system, is a measure of the uncertainty in a player’s rating. The greater a player’s RD, the more uncertainty exists about the player’s ability. The implication for rating updates is that players with large RDs typically incur large rating changes, and opponents of players with large RDs tend not to be impacted much by the game results against such players. The Glicko system has been in wide use on various chess servers, online gaming systems, as well as for non-gaming applications.

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

The Glicko system

Arguably one of the greatest fascinations of tournament chess players and competitors of other games is the measurement of playing strength. The Elo rating system, developed by Arpad Elo in the early 1960’s, was the first chess rating system that had probabilistic underpinnings, and was then adopted by many chess federations, and eventually by organizations for other games (e.g., Scrabble, tabl...

متن کامل

New Hitech Computer Chess Success

2460. Over this span it has scored 181 against players rated below it, and 38 against players rated above it. Of the eight points it lost against players rated above it, three were losses to International Grandmaster's, three were losses to International Master's, and there were two draws against players rated over 2500, (one an International Master). From previous tournaments rated by FIDE, th...

متن کامل

A chess rating system for evolutionary algorithms: A new method for the comparison and ranking of evolutionary algorithms

The null hypothesis significance testing (NHST) is of utmost importance for comparing evolutionary algorithms as the performance of one algorithm over another can be scientifically proven. However, NHST is often misused, improperly applied and misinterpreted. In order to avoid the pitfalls of NHST usage this paper proposes a new method, a Chess Rating System for Evolutionary Algorithms (CRS4EAs...

متن کامل

Bias in the ELO‒system of online chess

ELO is the key performance indicator in chess, a global and worldwide measure of chess skills and strength of chess play. Since their invention, ELO-systems are intended to be comparable and unbiased, so that chess players can know their level of play and can compare it among systems and internationally. Moreover, ELO is the defining feature of grandmasters with legal implications. Thus, it is ...

متن کامل

Understanding Distributions of Chess Performances

This paper studies the population of chess players and the distribution of their performances measured by Elo ratings and by computer analysis of moves. Evidence that ratings have remained stable since the inception of the Elo system in the 1970’s is given in several forms: by showing that the population of strong players fits a simple logistic-curve model without inflation, by plotting players...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

عنوان ژورنال:

دوره   شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 2011